NASA pores over moth-eaten manuals ahead of switch to backup hardware

 

Attempts to restart the computer failed, and a switch to a backup of the 1980s-era hardware resulted in the same memory error. Engineers cast their net wider as time wore on, considering potential issues with a power regulator as a possible culprit as well as the Command Unit/Science Data Formatter (CU/SDF), which sends and formats commands and data.

The formal review comes more than a month after a problem with a payload computer aboard the veteran observatory sent the telescope into safe mode and engineers scurrying for contingency plans.

Hubble, Hubble, toil and trouble: NASA pores over moth-eaten manuals ahead of switch to backup hardware

Procedure on stricken space telescope may be attempted later this week

Richard Speed

NASA has completed a formal review of what engineers will have to do to switch the Hubble Space Telescope to its backup hardware.

The formal review comes more than a month after a problem with a payload computer aboard the veteran observatory sent the telescope into safe mode and engineers scurrying for contingency plans.

Attempts to restart the computer failed, and a switch to a backup of the 1980s-era hardware resulted in the same memory error. Engineers cast their net wider as time wore on, considering potential issues with a power regulator as a possible culprit as well as the Command Unit/Science Data Formatter (CU/SDF), which sends and formats commands and data.

The hardware is highly redundant, but switching to backups at this level carries its own risks: "To switch to the backup CU/SDF or power regulator, several other hardware boxes on the spacecraft must also be switched due to the way they are connected to the SI C&DH [Science Instrument Command and Data Handling] unit," NASA posted at the end of June.

It's not entirely new ground for the team. A similar switch was done in 2008 after a CU/SDF module failed. However, back then a Space Shuttle servicing mission was on the cards for 2009. Today's engineers have no such luxury.

Wanna feel old? It is 10 years since the Space Shuttle left the launchpad for the last time

The James Webb Space Telescope, a project dating back to the late 1900s, may launch this very century

It's about time! NASA's orbital atomic clock a boon for deep space navigation – if they can get it working for long enough

Lego's Space Shuttle Discovery: No trouble with Hubble, but the stickers will drive a grown man to insanity

‘Radiation upset’ confused computers, caused false alarm on International Space Station

NASA has therefore spent much of July testing and reviewing procedures on a high-fidelity simulator of the hardware. Tests were completed last week, and a review aimed at minimising the risks associated with the procedures went ahead earlier this week.

 

A formal review into all the operations related to the switch to backup hardware has now been completed and there is every chance that engineers will have a go at the procedure later this week – perhaps a bit risky since the investigation into what actually befell the payload computer is not complete.

The Register asked NASA for a look at the reviewed procedures and will update should the agency respond. 

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.