the trial yesterday of former lieutenant governor lee hwa-young was set to another kim young-tae a newly attended lawyer resigned from the lawyers after submitting and submitting various documents not previously negotiated with the client former lieutenant governor lee hwa-young in the middle prosecutors and lawyers were energized and quarreled the reason this trial was hot in politics was that lee hwa-young peacekeepers reported the facts of the two-winter north korean money in advance to the then-minded gyeonggi-ji this is because the charges of the dexterity representative can change completely and may be on the prosecutions investigation line depending on whether or not this statement comes out of court yesterday as the trial became a catastrophe lieutenant governor lee hwa-young made no statement how will the controversy over the lawyers affect the trial in the future in addition he is the leader of the democratic partys prosecution and political opposition lets take a look with park joo-soo it is connected by phone are you with me anking news issue pick politics economy social world it photo tv advertising park jum-gye bts put in and save jamboree really the end of incompetence nocut news20230809 0922 final correction20230809 0932 comment 420 456 share knight image knight image park jumbo jambury failure bts full meeting is it a barracks country is it a trial this is the core of the next trial recession negotiation human rights infringement suspicion party protest democratic partys trial delay nonsense abolition of the delegates should be reduced in transients and table equivalents broadcast cbs radio yes nice to meet you hello kim jong-il id like to ask you for a general review of what you see as the decisive reason for the trial yesterday the adherence i can see it from a journalists perspective rather than a wavehang yesterday the trial was also made it should be seen that it was done and the highlight is that kim young-taes lawyer called you to the prosecutor it was such a scene where such expressions were quite interesting yesterday the fact that the return and intimidation that pleaded for another broadcast such as the democratic party from the wife of former lieutenant governor lee hwha-young was such a trial that the prosecutions return and threats were alleged by lawyers and whether there was a return and intimidation ill say the question should be seen how positive the defendant lee hwha-young is about the current progress the insiders refueling of evidence the allegations of intimidation and the key to the next trial kim jong-il ill take a closer look at the trial yesterday i just told you too two weeks ago lieutenant governor lee hwha-youngs wife dismissed the mining lawyer but he was new lieutenant governor lee hwha-young said that this seemed to be misunderstood by his wife and yesterday he again reinvented the sea light so as a whole i would like to hear from you how to interpret this which is the case with the democratic party and the wife of lieutenant governor lee hwa-young who was sent back to the prosecution and said it was oil painting to the prosecution but two times now he re-emerged the sea light amortic system well these situations where lawyers change or re-employ when there is room for change are often seen in the case of god so it doesnt seem to be largely unnatural or problematic as i said but my wife is refueling intimidating prosecution by prosecution there was a claim to intimidation and whether there was a halo on the back of the day and vice versa kim young-tae of duksoo who came out this time made a front-hand claim that there was a return intimidation through the prosecutions temperament whether the sea mine continues to hold the position of lawyer in this regard and what position the defendant lee hwha-young himself will take in the next trial was there a membership and intimidation if there is no premise and if you are keeping the sea light in your new office it is now that the deputys claim to the former lieutenant governor lee hwha-young is such a brother who gains great power kim jong-il if you see that now the words of the lawmakers have to watch what powers come out of the trial two weeks later so which power comes to mind is this the word of purpose the adherence its not that intention that the light is in the background of gray oil blackmail since his wife is making such a claim he says that there is such an aspect that the lieutenant governor lee hwha-youngs presence in the process of interlocking with refueling and intimidation kim jong-il mrs saw that and then there was a membership and intimidation on the democratic side and these claims came from some sort but you are the chairman anyway since you are now the chief of the prosecutors office the political opposition the chairmans opinion is a bit curious but are you seeing that there was a prosecutions return threats then the culprit two questions once received by the democratic party the wifes literary affairs had a clear expression that there was a threat of reflux and the pre-debate lieutenant governors handwritten petition did not report to the previous statement the representative of the lee jae-myeong isnt there such a statement that the last statement is maintained and that the former lieutenant governor lee hwa-youngs statement submitted by the prosecution had a report on the cost of the defense as revealed in the evidence process of lawyer kim young-tae yesterday but as we are kim young-tae a pretty famous lawyer the ideal that he claimed to be refueling intimidation and that petition was brought to his wife undoubtedly refueling im seeing a lot of doubt about the threat and more importantly the question that the prosecution continues to summon against the now-bound eunhwa-young defendant which has a problem with evidence is this legal another issue of summoning witnesses who have testified in court this will be quite there in addition as kim young-tae claimed yesterday the continued witness of the factual relationship outside the office of the factory and the office of the former lieutenant governor lee hwa-young seems to be for further prosecution but those issues are now highlighted in this regard our committee will continue to be interested watching and raising issues kim jun-il anyway im quite suspicious of gray oil and intimidation i understood this kim jong-il ill ask you a little bit of the prosecutions position yesterday the prosecutions side while talking about deliberate delays said it was very unfortunate and regrettable that there was an out-of-court attempt to shake criminal justice and i think im getting a mission for lawyer kim young-tae and lawyer kim young-tae of duk-soo i talked like this so as a whole if you talk easily the prosecution is not what ive confirmed now but its reasoning so now that this is the arrogant and connection of the de-nomination of the de-commissioning representative isnt it a deliberate delay to delay the trial and take time out isnt that a little bit of a command from the democratic party i have this interpretation how do you see the senator the adherence there may be no deliberate delay because it is a trial presided over by the judge it is said that you are trying to delay so that is not a structure that delays will pass through the democratic party is not involved there what matters is what the lawyer said anyway it is very important that a responsible lawyer anyway claimed a threat to return whether he expressed his intention to resign shakes in court if it points to the democratic party it is nonsense nonsense by the petitions and handwritten confirmations received by us we see that there is a human rights violation so we can return by lawyers since the allegations of intimidation came out it is said that it is a legitimate protest that the democratic partys point of pointing out and raising human rights issues as a public party is not an investigation into this trial kim jong-il ill ask you one question he said that there was a gray matter intimidation from the mouth of a responsible lawyer but in the case of kim young-tae he knew that he had rarely attended the trial process so far and the documents were not properly reviewed the prosecution claims did you know this properly or did the prosecution make this claim so im getting a mission again its a deliberate delay ive talked a bit like this and i havent grasped this im making this claim amortic first the mission is also a lawyers job whos the mission of the democratic party is that its ridiculous if the position of the defendant the defendant or the position of the defendants wife the mission is a legitimate defense the second of these issues we are talking about now outside and thats why there is no choice but rather is it now a legitimate trial now in such a situation where the defendants defenses are sufficiently guaranteed by the legitimate due process it is important if you say one more thing the time that the prosecution claims is now the cost of the north and that kim sung-tae claims is december 2019 but yesterday an important clue came out a statement submitted by the prosecution a statement about lee hwa-young reported the cost of the defense at the time of his resignation from the peacekeepers in december 2019 this expression comes out i dont know if all the books have been submitted but if the point of view is the cost of leaving the office when the peace governor retires in december 2019 diarrhea is not a post-reporting issue even if that is true not a pre-report kim jong-il post-mortem because after resignation the adherence in my eyes it was such a thing to note that it may not be related to the establishment of a crime kim jong-il okay as a result if you ask this short anyway as a result the trial is now being dug and you are not hearing the second week of lieutenant governor lee hwha-young which has nothing to do with democrats mission is not like this deliberate delay this is not youre in this way amortic nothing like that only 1 degree involved how so severe the democratic party has gone now a prosecution dictatorship i cant do that loudly kim jong-il okay im asking you questions because there are people who are curious about this the adherence is not kim jong-il im going to move on to the yeosang issue and to the nara issue korea is now in trouble because of the jamboree now jamboree is now choking with a wave and avoiding typhoons 37000 students now moved to the big game yesterday so what to do for the remaining 4 nights and 5 days now is the key especially the kpop performance at the sangam world cup stadium is getting attention yesterday seong jong-jongs national power wants the pentagon to help bts perform talking about it amid panclub amis are now repulsive and narrated how do you see jamborees response to the government so far the culprit already by the ruling party even the holy seong-jun himself admitted that this jamboree competition had failed due to lack of preparation and immature operation even the expression of the crashed national flag was written by the ruling partys current senator all the truths have been revealed here i even commented so there was an expression that it was really the end of incompetence thats the public opinion i regret if i miss the golden time of jamborees success from the policy leader of the peoples power do you think there is still a golden time to write this expression do you think that golden time is a matter of being able to make a high school by appearing in bts also is it possible to do that power and qualifications to make two soldiers enlisted in the bts appear in the lead they are fulfilling their defense duties through the body through the body through the body through the duty of the defense why they are trying to force mobilization of these skills or qualities or such a foreknowledge here so it is different from the barracks indeed it is a clogged situation i think it happens kim jong-il barracks said by the way the peoples party is now talking about the governments theory of responsibility in august 2017 during the government of the moon jae-in this was confirmed at the world jamboree general assembly and held and what did the government the literary government do for five years now and in preparation he went on a business trip to jeonbuk-do and buan-gun and it is also the responsibility of the government to appoint an inexperienced secretary-general im talking about this what position do you have about this the culprit mr moderator whats wrong with this time is the so-called shade-like problem with binge the problem of food the problem of eating the filthy toilet and many other problems it takes 5 years to prepare this 4 years and isnt it such a problem kim jong-il it takes less than 5 years to prepare for the bathroom the culprit its a problem that takes less than 5 years 1 year 3 months now 1 year 3 months after this government came to power what have you done in the meantime indeed isnt this a problem that requires high-tech skills and what functions didnt you say that youre normalized to self-portraits because youre now the president and prime minister deok-soo han but yesterday 45000 former jamboree crews were scattered all over the country so the authenticity and sex that you say you can do then and such a competent preparation i point out that these things have been completely eliminated by this government for three months a year but if you blame it and blame the former government do you admit that the people are against the former government thats ridiculous kim jong-il im blaming the former government ill take a look at my democratic party the innovation level is still controversial now and the third innovation originally scheduled for yesterday has been postponed tomorrow and 10 days tomorrow from here to the abolition related to the delegates it is now becoming a giant and the other is to announce the gongcheon rule now which is a lot of backlash such as party backlash and members of the oversized people how do you see this the question of the equivalence of the votes of this delegate and the rights officer is not todays story its a long-standing democratic partys long-standing problem and its a debate thats materialized as the governors party leader literally this is not a problem with the release of a particular person it also has nothing to do with whether or not to hold the national assembly early now there is such an expression that the equivalence of the votes of the current rights and delegates is even 100 to 1 kim jong-il now its adjusted to 60 to 1 at the national assembly the culprit so it seems to be a matter of how reasonably the issue of the equivalence of the vote will be adjusted to the extent that the majority of the parties are taking it and until the abolition personally it is excessive now however i have that idea whether the equivalence of the current table should not be significantly lowered kim jong-il but is this innovative and relevant now but these may be of interest to the party but the people see it as a 1 to 1 or 20 to 1 star innovation to change this there is such criticism the culprit i dont just have the issue of equivalence of the right party vote but whether its a matter of morality raised to the democratic party or the activation of democracy democracy etc is something that can be said in innovation now there was a controversial issue with the chairman of the innovation but regardless of that this innovation is at least a cause of the money-bonging event so there are now over 10 members in the innovation if we exercise their collective intelligence and present a good eye our party leadership and lawmakers will have a reasonable debate that i think will decide whether to accept it kim jong-il ill hear this so far he has been a member of the democratic partys accomplice thank you senator.