The Physicist With A Hangover Thought Experiment Illustrating Microcosmic Research

A Thinking Thought Reflecting Microcosmic Research


Assume that a certain physicist-experimenter has the task of determining the linking of a certain small particle to an X-axis at a given time, T1 with unambiguous accuracy. Can this be achieved?


In general, in the measurement action in the microcosm, there are fixed limits indicated by Heisenberg's uncertainty, or the goal of uncertainty. This limitation affects a certain combination of parameters of small particles that can be measured simultaneously with inaccurate accuracy. But in this case, there is only one action for measuring a simple parameter on only one axis. So even the most powerful physicist will say, it is possible without limits. This operation is possible.


So, our temptation starts the issue. If in the given T1 speed you press the red button that starts the measurement test, you will determine the connection of the micro-particle X1 with unambiguous accuracy. What will it be? It is important to emphasize, that there will be no dark cloud of possible values, not a matrix of invisible mathematics, not a transformation of any mysterious activity? It is the result of a straightforward localized measurement at a time and in a single link location.


However, the situation is complicated by the fact that the detective began his career of having a powerful hangover after a massive junket yesterday. It was hard for him to hit the first red button, so he missed and did not start the test. The measurement action was not possible.


No worries. It is possible to make an estimate later. Suppose our physicist decides to postpone the measurement action until a minute of time T2 = T1 + t, when t = 1 minute. Since the first measurement action had not taken place, the situation had not actually changed. Restrictions not set. The new acceptable standard is made with unambiguous accuracy. If all is well, the tester will find a direct link to the X2 particles. And it will be a point on the axcissa axis, but elsewhere. Some have already speculated that our naturalist also missed the first red button. Also, the measure did not occur. He repeats the test and again misses point X3.


Therefore, we will interpret the situation. Our trial had a series of probabilities of the fulfillment of the measurement action on instants T1, T2, T3… T (n)… with inter-spaced t. In any of these, he can find the direct link of a small particle to the axcissa axis X1, X2, X3… X (n)…. We take advantage of the fact that in experimental thinking, it is possible to allow some funny things to happen, we will force a period of time like to go to zero. All in all, we will find an endless series of points on the axis in its space that is closer to zero. Points actually combine into one curve.


What is this curve? It is a drawing of direct links of a small particle along the axcissa axis over a period of time. Therefore, at any time within this space, there will be a point in the curve, there will be a direct link to the axcissa axis. In other words, each point in this curve can be obtained if the temptation at the right time will begin the measurement action. Obviously, strong clarification here is possible; there are no random loop holes and opportunities.


But that is not all. We would assume that our physicist was so complex that he touched the instruments and accidentally changed the shoulder of the measuring instrument from the X-axis to the Y-axis. Now all measurements will work on the system axis. In general, a concrete curve with measurable coordinates of a small particle will be recovered. All the axes in us are equal, so because of the same mental approach, we can find a direct curve near the Z-axis.


Therefore, we cut three curves in line with the three axes. They can be integrated into a single local trail that can safely be called a "trajectory". If the examiner performs only one measuring action on any of the three axes at any one time within a given space, he establishes a point in the curve (and nowhere else!). On the other hand, each point in this local curve can be found if we timely measure any of the three coats of links we choose. There is a completely unique connection that does not allow for different interpretations.


As a result of this experimental study, we come to the conclusion that a small particle extraction curve actually exists, has a precise position in space and time and can be easily detected with inaccurate accuracy anywhere at any selected axis. This is a general decision-making process.



Problems will arise when we set the task to find, say, a direct link of two or more points simultaneously. Here the key to determining our relationship with the microcosm is already in effect. We called it the "second rate problem". Twentieth-century naturalists have commented on Heisenberg's uncertainty, or goal of resilience.


There are events in the human experience of the macrocosm; there are events in the microcosm. And there is a process of transmission, of the introduction of microcosm events into our macrocosm. It is important to emphasize that the above-mentioned problem does not affect events in the human macrocosm and microcosm. It only affects the translation process. Here on the border of the two countries, there are some important difficulties that we have already written about in the article "Ring Determinism and Probability".It can be explained from the outset how difficult it is to transfer more than one value (with incomprehensible accuracy) to measure the value from a microcosm to a human macrocosm. What about the other required prices? Now that there is an error in our standard test method, that opens the gates carelessly and randomly. It is necessary for compensation for power to turn to indirect descriptive use - computer processes: uncluttered clouds of potential value space, invisible templates and a capable transformation of an obscure work ?.


It is important to emphasize, too, that all these indirect processes do not have a direct relationship with real events and processes in the microcosm. These are just computer-aided programs - simple explanations for scientists, that allow, in a way, to address the problem of presenting events from one pattern to another. In the experimental assumptions above, it has been shown that the micro-particle (trajectory) movement curve actually exists. Also, each point can be obtained by trying with the wrong accuracy. However, it is not possible for us to place a curved stain on a drawing with precision contours (although it can be done in a bubble room or in an expansion room).


The positivists (physicists and philosophers) in this case come up with a humorous conclusion;


Physicians, scientists and philosophers, have to answer this evil in a solid scientific way in a divided way: the separation of the most recent descriptive models of reality from the physical reality itself. Ultimately, it will allow for its removal from modern microcosmic physics, which is already confused with the dominance of the absurd method of interpretation, and achieve success in understanding the depth of the body's proper processes.


You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Author
Recent Articles